I was recently helping some colleagues think about interviewing techniques. I like to see work product from people. So, a while back I developed an assessment that we use. It has been a big help in evaluating candidates. It was incremental problem where each step was a question that led to a larger solution. It wasn't perfect, but I got to see some evolution of thinking.
When I worked at Microsoft we took our interviewing very seriously. Certainly, there are lots of stories (myths?) out there about the process. Some truer than others. I have a master list of good questions and suggestions I still find helpful to review to get into the right mindset. I avoid the "Mount Fuji" questions since they just don't give me much useful data.
Along these lines...I was recently turned onto InterviewZen. I like the idea of being able to watch a recording of someone creating a work product. We have a classic computer science sort of problem (weighted graph) that I use, but I don't get to see the person working thru their thinking. I am going to try and adapt mine to this format.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Tired of my GenX references yet? No? Good, here is another one. Let me explain. As you may notice from my more recent blog entries, "AI...
-
Anthropic released a new feature called Skills and I have been messing around with them. When I first read about skills it was not clear ho...
-
Maybe you've been here too—that irresistible urge to be right. Whether in meetings, conversations, or even casual debates, there's s...

No comments:
Post a Comment